Research evaluation in context 1: Introducing research evaluation in the Netherlands How is research being evaluated in the Netherlands? Why in that way? Why would the Dutch want to evaluate research anyway when it is done like that? What is an evaluation really about? No, but really? And how do you compare between….? You don’t? And consequences? Not?? Leonie van Drooge • February 16, 2021
A glimpse into the projects at CWTS In my last days as a project coordinator at CWTS, I'm reflecting on the so-called institute projects we all do at CWTS. In this blog post I would like to share with you my experience as a project coordinator, but first and foremost give you an impression of the variety of projects we do. Josephine Bergmans • January 15, 2021
Skill gaps of PhD graduates Based on our research, we discuss which gaps exist between the skills PhD graduates developed during their PhD and the skills that are required and valued in their current job. Which relevant skills do graduates bring to future jobs and which skills were underdeveloped during their PhD trajectory? Cathelijn Waaijer, Julia Heuritsch and Inge van der Weijden • January 08, 2021
The changing logics of scientific publishing The subscription model is taken over by the open-access model in scientific publishing industry, which may favor quantity over quality. While we should be aware of predatory practices by any journal, labeling journals as predatory may reinforce established hierarchies in the scientific community. Koen Frenken • January 04, 2021 • 2 comments
2020's last blog post... and a Christmas surprise! It's holiday time for Leiden Madtrics as well. We wish you all restful days off and are looking forward to seeing you again in the new year. In the meantime, have fun reading this blog post written by Ed Noyons about a very unique Christmas surprise taking place in the city of Utrecht. Ed Noyons • December 24, 2020
Q&A about Elsevier's decision to open its citations Last week Elsevier announced that it has signed the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) and that it is going to make the reference lists of articles openly available in Crossref. In this Q&A, Ludo Waltman shares his perspective on Elsevier’s decision to open its citations. Ludo Waltman • December 22, 2020 • 1 comment
The causal intricacies of studying gender bias in science A recently published paper on the role of gender in mentorship in science has triggered a lot of debate. In this blog post, Vincent Traag and Ludo Waltman contribute to this debate by emphasizing the importance of understanding the underlying causal mechanisms. Vincent Traag and Ludo Waltman • December 10, 2020
Responsible Research & Innovation or Open Science - does the label matter? Here, we assert that Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) and Open Science (OS) can be meaningfully compared as transformative change agendas for R&I. We propose looking for differences in terms of what motivates a transformative agenda, i.e. why do we need to open up the R&I system? Clare Shelley-Egan, Rune Nydal and Mads Dahl Gjefsen • December 08, 2020
Knowledge integration for societal challenges: from interdisciplinarity to research portfolio analysis For research to address societal challenges, indicators of average degree of ‘interdisciplinarity’ are not relevant. Instead, we propose a portfolio approach to analyze knowledge integration as a systemic process; in particular, the directions, diversity and synergies of research trajectories. Ismael Ràfols • December 01, 2020
