Leiden Madtrics

  • Home
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Search this site
Welcome to Leiden Madtrics!

Welcome to Leiden Madtrics!

Madtrics is a portmanteau, a blend of words between mad and metrics. We hope that Leiden Madtrics serves as a way to inspire and educate about topics such as the (mis)use of research metrics, indicators, and rankings in academia. Here are 5 reasons why you should frequent our blog!

Tung Tung Chan • October 31, 2019

Reflections on the Impact of Science Conference 2019

Reflections on the Impact of Science Conference 2019

How is impact perceived and evaluated in national and regional science systems nowadays? Which stakeholders are involved and what examples exist on a national and international level? In this post, Grischa Fraumann reports on the Impact of Science conference from 5 until 7 June 2019 in Berlin.

Grischa Fraumann • October 31, 2019

The Pain of Labeling Things

The Pain of Labeling Things

Labeling things is hard, but labeling groups of things is harder! At CWTS we automatically group publications and label them with an algorithm, but these labels can be puzzling for human minds. In this post, I find out how the same group of publications can have the labels "queer theory" and "home".

Juan Pablo Bascur Cifuentes • October 31, 2019

Mapping science using Microsoft Academic data

Mapping science using Microsoft Academic data

This blog post discusses the emergence of new data sources in the field of bibliometrics, and how to use them to map science.

Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman • October 28, 2019 • 2 comments

Why are global health needs unmet by research efforts?

Why are global health needs unmet by research efforts?

Not all diseases receive equal research attention across the globe. This phenomenon, often referred to as the 10/90 gap in health research, has a long history, rife with contention and debate on its accuracy. New research seeks to uncover various factors perpetuating these inequalities.

Ismael Rafols, Alfredo Yegros, María Francisca Abad-García and Wouter van de Klippe • October 24, 2019

  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
Subscribe to email notifications

Contributors

  • Marta Sienkiewicz

    Marta Sienkiewicz

    PhD candidate

  • Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

    Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

    Independent researcher, Ikenobe, Kagawa-ken, Japan

  • Elizabeth Gadd

    Elizabeth Gadd

    Research Culture & Quality Lead

  • Niki Vermeulen

    Niki Vermeulen

    Researcher

All contributors >

Categories

  • Book Review
  • CWTS Development
  • Focal Area: Information & Openness
  • Focal Area: Engagement & Inclusion
  • Focal Area: Evaluation & Culture
  • How-to
  • Long-read
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Resources
  • Science & Society
  • STI 2023
  • Summary & Review

Tags

  • funding acknowledgments
  • knowledge agenda
  • transparent peer review
  • social media
  • monitoring science
  • open scholarly communication
  • stakeholder involvement
  • negotiations

All tags >

Stay Connected

Info

  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
  • Subscribe to our newsletter